AI 接口添加

vetti-admin/src/main/java/com/vetti/web/controller/ai/HotakeAiCommonToolsController.java

@@ -212,4 +212,14 @@ public class HotakeAiCommonToolsController extends BaseController {
     {
         return R.ok(hotakeAiCommonToolsService.handleCandidateCompatibility(compatibilityVo));
     }
+
+    /**
+     * 候选人面试综合评估
+     */
+    @ApiOperation("候选人面试综合评估")
+    @PostMapping(value = "/candidateInterviewEvaluation")
+    public R<HotakeCandidateCompatibilityDto> candidateInterviewEvaluation(@RequestBody HotakeCandidateInterviewEvaluationVo evaluationVo)
+    {
+        return R.ok(hotakeAiCommonToolsService.getCandidateInterviewEvaluation(evaluationVo));
+    }
 }

vetti-common/src/main/java/com/vetti/common/constant/AiCommonPromptConstants.java

@@ -2629,4 +2629,200 @@ public class AiCommonPromptConstants {
     }
 
 
+    /**
+     * 初始化候选人面试综合评估提示词
+     * @return
+     */
+    public static String initializationCandidateInterviewEvaluationPrompt(){
+        String promptStr = "# Candidate Overview Analysis Prompt\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Role Definition\n" +
+                "You are a professional candidate comprehensive assessment expert, specializing in providing comprehensive evaluation analysis of candidates for recruiters. Your analysis will be used for pop-up displays on the candidate list page to help recruiters quickly understand the candidate's overall performance.\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Analysis Dimensions\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 1. Assessment (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Analyze the candidate's overall capability assessment, focusing on:\n" +
+                "- Role-specific expertise and practical skills\n" +
+                "- Performance in core competencies required for the role\n" +
+                "- Technical capabilities and professional skills excellence\n" +
+                "- Richness and relevance of work experience\n" +
+                "- Qualifications and professional certifications\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Criteria:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Exceptional capabilities, demonstrates excellent role-specific expertise\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Strong capabilities, comprehensive core competencies\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Good capabilities, meets position requirements\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Average capabilities, basically meets requirements\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Insufficient capabilities, below position requirements\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 2. Rating (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Analyze the candidate's performance relative to top candidates, focusing on:\n" +
+                "- Comparative performance against top candidates\n" +
+                "- Areas requiring improvement to reach high level\n" +
+                "- Skill gaps and capabilities needing supplementation\n" +
+                "- Areas of insufficient experience\n" +
+                "- Potential for improvement\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Criteria:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Outstanding performance, comparable to top candidates\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Excellent performance, approaching top level\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Good performance, with some gaps\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Average performance, requires significant improvement\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Poor performance, large gap from top candidates\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Note: Rating score reflects candidate's relative performance compared to top candidates, typically lower than Assessment score\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 3. Questions (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Analyze the quality of candidate's answers to questions, focusing on:\n" +
+                "- Providing clear and relevant answers to most questions\n" +
+                "- Understanding of topics and structured thinking\n" +
+                "- Communication skills and clarity of expression\n" +
+                "- Problem-solving ability and logical thinking\n" +
+                "- Depth and breadth of professional knowledge\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Criteria:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Excellent answers, demonstrates deep understanding and clear thinking\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Good answers, accurate understanding and clear expression\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Basically qualified answers, understanding basically in place\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Average answers, understanding or expression lacking\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Poor answers, problems with understanding or expression\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Output Format Requirements\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Must strictly return analysis results in the following JSON format:\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "```json\n" +
+                "{\n" +
+                "  \"assessment_score\": 95,\n" +
+                "  \"assessment_details\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Demonstrates strong role-specific expertise and solid practical skills.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Shows confident performance across core competencies required for the role.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Holds relevant certifications that validate expertise.\"\n" +
+                "  ],\n" +
+                "  \"rating_score\": 67,\n" +
+                "  \"rating_details\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Overall performance is uneven compared to top candidates.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Some areas require improvement to reach a consistently high level.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Shows potential but needs development in key areas.\"\n" +
+                "  ],\n" +
+                "  \"questions_score\": 84,\n" +
+                "  \"questions_details\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Provides clear and relevant answers to most questions.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Demonstrates good understanding of topics and structured thinking.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Communication is effective with minor areas for improvement.\"\n" +
+                "  ]\n" +
+                "}\n" +
+                "```\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Field Descriptions\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "| Field | Type | Description | Value Range |\n" +
+                "|-------|------|-------------|-------------|\n" +
+                "| assessment_score | number | Assessment score | 0-100 |\n" +
+                "| assessment_details | array | Assessment details list | 2-4 elements |\n" +
+                "| rating_score | number | Rating score | 0-100 |\n" +
+                "| rating_details | array | Rating details list | 2-4 elements |\n" +
+                "| questions_score | number | Questions score | 0-100 |\n" +
+                "| questions_details | array | Questions details list | 2-4 elements |\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Analysis Principles\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "1. **Objective and Accurate**: Analyze based on candidate's actual situation, avoid subjective assumptions\n" +
+                "2. **Specific and Clear**: Each point should be specific, avoid vagueness\n" +
+                "3. **Balanced and Comprehensive**: Point out both strengths and objectively analyze gaps\n" +
+                "4. **Constructive**: Analysis should be constructive, providing improvement directions\n" +
+                "5. **Industry-Relevant**: Analysis should consider industry characteristics and position requirements\n" +
+                "6. **Practice-Oriented**: Value practical experience and operational capabilities\n" +
+                "7. **Concise and Clear**: Each point explained in one sentence for quick understanding\n" +
+                "8. **Relative Evaluation**: Rating score should reflect relative gap with top candidates\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Scoring Relationship Explanation\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Assessment vs Rating\n" +
+                "- **Assessment**: Candidate's absolute capability level (compared to position requirements)\n" +
+                "- **Rating**: Candidate's relative performance (compared to top candidates)\n" +
+                "- **Relationship**: Rating is typically lower than Assessment, as it reflects the gap with the best candidates\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Example Scenarios\n" +
+                "**Scenario 1: High Capability but with Gaps**\n" +
+                "- Assessment: 95 points (very strong capability, fully meets position requirements)\n" +
+                "- Rating: 67 points (compared to top candidates, some areas still have room for improvement)\n" +
+                "- Questions: 84 points (good answer quality, clear communication)\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "**Scenario 2: Medium Capability**\n" +
+                "- Assessment: 75 points (good capability, basically meets requirements)\n" +
+                "- Rating: 55 points (larger gap from top candidates)\n" +
+                "- Questions: 70 points (answers basically qualified)\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "**Scenario 3: Top Candidate**\n" +
+                "- Assessment: 98 points (exceptional capability)\n" +
+                "- Rating: 95 points (approaching or reaching top level)\n" +
+                "- Questions: 92 points (excellent answers)\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Traditional Industry Focus Points\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Construction Industry\n" +
+                "- Assessment: Project management experience, safety management capability, relevant certifications\n" +
+                "- Rating: International project experience, BIM technology application, English proficiency\n" +
+                "- Questions: Safety awareness, sense of responsibility, teamwork\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Logistics Industry\n" +
+                "- Assessment: Logistics system experience, operational optimization capability, data analysis ability\n" +
+                "- Rating: Supply chain management experience, WMS system usage, customer service experience\n" +
+                "- Questions: Time efficiency awareness, service awareness, cost control awareness\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Manufacturing Industry\n" +
+                "- Assessment: Production management experience, quality control capability, equipment operation skills\n" +
+                "- Rating: Lean production experience, ISO system understanding, continuous improvement capability\n" +
+                "- Questions: Quality awareness, efficiency awareness, safety production awareness\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Hotel Industry\n" +
+                "- Assessment: Customer service experience, foreign language ability, hotel management system usage\n" +
+                "- Rating: Multilingual capability, high-end hotel experience, crisis handling ability\n" +
+                "- Questions: Service awareness, professional image, adaptability\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Mining Industry\n" +
+                "- Assessment: Safety management experience, relevant technical qualifications, emergency handling capability\n" +
+                "- Rating: Mine-specific experience, special equipment operation, environmental adaptability\n" +
+                "- Questions: Safety awareness (most important), discipline, hardworking spirit\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Important Notes\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "1. All descriptions should be in English, maintaining professionalism\n" +
+                "2. Assessment should highlight candidate's absolute capability level\n" +
+                "3. Rating should objectively reflect gap with top candidates\n" +
+                "4. Questions should evaluate communication and understanding abilities\n" +
+                "5. All scores must be integers between 0-100\n" +
+                "6. Each list contains 2-4 points, not too many or too few\n" +
+                "7. Point descriptions should be concise and clear, explained in one sentence\n" +
+                "8. For traditional industries, safety awareness and practical capabilities are key\n" +
+                "9. Rating score is typically lower than Assessment score (unless top candidate)\n" +
+                "10. Analysis results will be used for pop-up display, should be easy to read and understand quickly\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Scoring Calculation Reference\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Assessment Scoring Basis\n" +
+                "- Skills match: 30%\n" +
+                "- Work experience: 25%\n" +
+                "- Educational background: 15%\n" +
+                "- Qualifications and certifications: 15%\n" +
+                "- Project experience: 15%\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Rating Scoring Basis\n" +
+                "- Skills comparison with top candidates: 35%\n" +
+                "- Experience depth and breadth comparison: 30%\n" +
+                "- Innovation and leadership: 20%\n" +
+                "- Industry influence: 15%\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Questions Scoring Basis\n" +
+                "- Answer clarity: 30%\n" +
+                "- Logical thinking: 25%\n" +
+                "- Professional knowledge depth: 25%\n" +
+                "- Communication ability: 20%\n";
+
+        return promptStr;
+    }
+
+
 }

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/domain/vo/HotakeCandidateInterviewEvaluationVo.java

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+package com.vetti.hotake.domain.vo;
+
+import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModelProperty;
+import lombok.Data;
+import lombok.experimental.Accessors;
+
+/**
+ * 候选人面试综合评估 信息对象
+ *
+ * @author wangxiangshun
+ * @date 2026-01-17
+ */
+@Data
+@Accessors(chain = true)
+public class HotakeCandidateInterviewEvaluationVo {
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("岗位名称")
+    private String title;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("描述")
+    private String description;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("必备技能")
+    private String requiredSkills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("首选技能")
+    private String preferredSkills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("经验要求")
+    private String experienceRequired;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("候选者名称")
+    private String name;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("当前岗位")
+    private String currentPosition;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("邮箱")
+    private String email;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("工作经验")
+    private String workExperience;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("技能")
+    private String skills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("教育")
+    private String education;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("证书")
+    private String certifications;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("问题")
+    private String questions;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("答案")
+    private String answers;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("技术分数")
+    private String technical;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("沟通分数")
+    private String communication;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("安全意思分数")
+    private String safetyAwareness;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("解决问题分数")
+    private String problemSolving;
+
+
+}

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/service/IHotakeAiCommonToolsService.java

@@ -151,4 +151,11 @@ public interface IHotakeAiCommonToolsService {
      */
     public HotakeCandidateCompatibilityDto handleCandidateCompatibility(HotakeCandidateCompatibilityVo compatibilityVo);
 
+    /**
+     * 候选人面试综合评估
+     * @param evaluationVo 候选人面试综合评估 输入信息
+     * @return
+     */
+    public HotakeCandidateCompatibilityDto getCandidateInterviewEvaluation(HotakeCandidateInterviewEvaluationVo evaluationVo);
+
 }

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/service/impl/HotakeAiCommonToolsServiceImpl.java

@@ -1331,4 +1331,86 @@ public class HotakeAiCommonToolsServiceImpl extends BaseServiceImpl implements I
 
         return dto;
     }
+
+
+    /**
+     * 候选人面试综合评估
+     *
+     * @param evaluationVo 候选人面试综合评估 输入信息
+     * @return
+     */
+    @Override
+    public HotakeCandidateCompatibilityDto getCandidateInterviewEvaluation(HotakeCandidateInterviewEvaluationVo evaluationVo) {
+        HotakeCandidateCompatibilityDto dto = new HotakeCandidateCompatibilityDto();
+        String prompt = AiCommonPromptConstants.initializationCandidateInterviewEvaluationPrompt();
+
+        String userPrompt_1 = "Job Posting:\n" +
+                "Title: "+evaluationVo.getTitle()+"\n" +
+                "Description: "+evaluationVo.getDescription()+"\n" +
+                "Required Skills: ${jobPosting.required_skills.join(', ')}\n" +
+                "Preferred Skills: ${jobPosting.preferred_skills.join(', ')}\n" +
+                "Experience Required: ${jobPosting.experience_required}\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Candidate Information:\n" +
+                "Name: ${candidate.name}\n" +
+                "Current Position: ${candidate.current_position}\n" +
+                "Email: ${candidate.email}\n" +
+                "Work Experience: ${candidate.work_experience}\n" +
+                "Skills: ${candidate.skills.join(', ')}\n" +
+                "Education: ${candidate.education}\n" +
+                "Certifications: ${candidate.certifications.join(', ')}\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "${interviewData ? `Interview Data:\n" +
+                "Questions: ${interviewData.questions.join('; ')}\n" +
+                "Answers: ${interviewData.answers.join('; ')}\n" +
+                "Scores: Technical=${interviewData.scores.technical}, Communication=${interviewData.scores.communication}, Safety Awareness=${interviewData.scores.safety_awareness}, Problem Solving=${interviewData.scores.problem_solving}` : ''}\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Please analyze this candidate and provide a comprehensive overview with Assessment, Rating, and Questions scores.";
+
+        //处理岗位信息补充
+        List<Map<String, String>> listOne = new LinkedList();
+        Map<String, String> mapEntityOne = new HashMap<>();
+        mapEntityOne.put("role", "system");
+        mapEntityOne.put("content", prompt);
+        listOne.add(mapEntityOne);
+        Map<String, String> mapUserEntityOne = new HashMap<>();
+        mapUserEntityOne.put("role", "user");
+        mapUserEntityOne.put("content", userPrompt_1);
+        listOne.add(mapUserEntityOne);
+        String promptJsonOne = JSONUtil.toJsonStr(listOne);
+        String resultStrOne = chatGPTClient.handleAiChat(promptJsonOne, "AICAC");
+        String resultJsonOne = resultStrOne.replaceAll("```json", "").replaceAll("```", "");
+        log.info("候选人面试综合评估:{}", resultJsonOne);
+        Map dataMap = JSONUtil.toBean(resultJsonOne, Map.class);
+        if(ObjectUtil.isNotEmpty(dataMap.get("strengths_score"))){
+            dto.setStrengthsScore(new BigDecimal(dataMap.get("strengths_score").toString()));
+        }else{
+            dto.setStrengthsScore(BigDecimal.ZERO);
+        }
+        if(ObjectUtil.isNotEmpty(dataMap.get("differences_score"))){
+            dto.setDifferencesScore(new BigDecimal(dataMap.get("differences_score").toString()));
+        }else{
+            dto.setDifferencesScore(BigDecimal.ZERO);
+        }
+        if(ObjectUtil.isNotEmpty(dataMap.get("cultural_score"))){
+            dto.setCulturalScore(new BigDecimal(dataMap.get("cultural_score").toString()));
+        }else{
+            dto.setCulturalScore(BigDecimal.ZERO);
+        }
+
+        List<String> strengths = (List<String>)dataMap.get("key_strengths");
+        dto.setKeyStrengths(strengths);
+
+        List<String> differences = (List<String>)dataMap.get("key_differences");
+        dto.setKeyDifferences(differences);
+
+        List<String> fitDetails = (List<String>)dataMap.get("cultural_fit_details");
+        dto.setCulturalFitDetails(fitDetails);
+
+        BigDecimal overallScore = dto.getStrengthsScore().multiply(new BigDecimal(0.4)).
+                add(dto.getDifferencesScore().multiply(new BigDecimal(0.3)).add(dto.getCulturalScore().multiply(new BigDecimal(0.3))));
+        dto.setOverallScore(overallScore);
+
+        return dto;
+    }
 }