AI 集成基础方法添加

vetti-admin/src/main/java/com/vetti/web/controller/ai/HotakeAiCommonToolsController.java

@@ -192,4 +192,23 @@ public class HotakeAiCommonToolsController extends BaseController {
         return R.ok(hotakeAiCommonToolsService.handleCandidateAiInterviewAnalysis(analysisVo));
     }
 
+    /**
+     * 招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统
+     */
+    @ApiOperation("招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统")
+    @PostMapping(value = "/aiCvScoringRanking")
+    public R<?> aiCvScoringRanking(@RequestBody HotakeAiCvScoringRankingVo scoringRankingVo)
+    {
+        return R.ok(hotakeAiCommonToolsService.handleAiCvScoringRanking(scoringRankingVo));
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * 招聘者查看候选人匹配度
+     */
+    @ApiOperation("招聘者查看候选人匹配度")
+    @PostMapping(value = "/candidateCompatibility")
+    public R<?> candidateCompatibility(@RequestBody HotakeCandidateCompatibilityVo compatibilityVo)
+    {
+        return R.ok(hotakeAiCommonToolsService.handleCandidateCompatibility(compatibilityVo));
+    }
 }

vetti-admin/src/main/resources/application-druid.yml

@@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ chatGpt:
     modelRLinkAl: gpt-4o-mini
     modelRLinkAl_1: gpt-4o-mini
     modelAiIntPf: gpt-4o-mini
+    modelAiCvSr: gpt-4o-mini
+    modelAiCac: gpt-4o-mini
     role: system
 
 http:

vetti-common/src/main/java/com/vetti/common/ai/gpt/ChatGPTClient.java

@@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ public class ChatGPTClient {
     @Value("${chatGpt.modelAiIntPf}")
     private String modelAiIntPf;
 
+    @Value("${chatGpt.modelAiCvSr}")
+    private String modelAiCvSr;
+
+    @Value("${chatGpt.modelAiCac}")
+    private String modelAiCac;
+
     @Value("${chatGpt.role}")
     private String role;
 
@@ -146,6 +152,12 @@ public class ChatGPTClient {
             }else if("AIINTPF".equals(type)){
                 //候选人AI面试分析
                 resultText = sendMessage(promptText, modelAiIntPf,objectMapper,client,role);
+            }else if("AICVSR".equals(type)){
+                //招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统
+                resultText = sendMessage(promptText, modelAiCvSr,objectMapper,client,role);
+            }else if("AICAC".equals(type)){
+                //招聘者查看候选人匹配度
+                resultText = sendMessage(promptText, modelAiCac,objectMapper,client,role);
             }else {
                 resultText = sendMessage(promptText, modelQuestion,objectMapper,client,role);
             }

vetti-common/src/main/java/com/vetti/common/constant/AiCommonPromptConstants.java

@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ public class AiCommonPromptConstants {
     }
 
     /**
-     * 初始化AI生成问题提示词
+     * 初始化候选人AI面试分析提示词
      * @return
      */
     public static String initializationCandidateAiInterviewAnalysisPrompt(){
@@ -2276,5 +2276,357 @@ public class AiCommonPromptConstants {
         return promptStr;
     }
 
+    /**
+     * 初始化招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统提示词
+     * @return
+     */
+    public static String initializationAiCvScoringRankingPrompt(){
+        String promptStr = "# AI Resume Scoring Prompt\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Role Definition\n" +
+                "You are a professional resume scoring expert specializing in candidate assessment for traditional industries (construction, logistics, manufacturing, hospitality, mining).\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Scoring Dimensions\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 1. Skills Match (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Assessment Criteria:\n" +
+                "- Mastery of required skills\n" +
+                "- Coverage of nice-to-have skills\n" +
+                "- Practical application experience\n" +
+                "- Relevant certifications and qualifications\n" +
+                "- Skill depth and breadth\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Standards:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Perfect match, comprehensive skills, extensive experience\n" +
+                "- 80-89: High match, core skills complete\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Basic match, main skills present\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Partial match, training needed\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Low match, significant skill gap\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 2. Experience Match (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Assessment Criteria:\n" +
+                "- Years of experience meet requirements\n" +
+                "- Relevant industry experience\n" +
+                "- Similar position experience\n" +
+                "- Project experience relevance\n" +
+                "- Career development trajectory\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Standards:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Experience perfectly matches, exceeds expectations\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Experience highly matches, meets requirements\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Experience basically matches, slight gap\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Experience partially matches, adaptation needed\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Insufficient or irrelevant experience\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 3. Education (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Assessment Criteria:\n" +
+                "- Education level meets requirements\n" +
+                "- Major relevance\n" +
+                "- School background\n" +
+                "- Continuous learning ability\n" +
+                "- Professional training experience\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Standards:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Excellent education background, fully meets requirements\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Good education background, basically meets requirements\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Average education background, acceptable\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Poor education background, supplementation needed\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Education background does not meet requirements\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 4. Cultural Fit (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Assessment Criteria:\n" +
+                "- Value alignment with company culture\n" +
+                "- Work attitude and professional ethics\n" +
+                "- Teamwork ability\n" +
+                "- Stability and loyalty\n" +
+                "- Career goals align with company development\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Standards:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Highly aligned, consistent values\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Good alignment, strong adaptability\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Basic alignment, adjustment period needed\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Average alignment, risks exist\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Misaligned, significant value differences\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 5. Potential (0-100 points)\n" +
+                "Assessment Criteria:\n" +
+                "- Learning ability and growth speed\n" +
+                "- Career development trajectory\n" +
+                "- Innovation thinking and problem-solving ability\n" +
+                "- Leadership potential\n" +
+                "- Career planning clarity\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Standards:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Great potential, large growth space\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Good potential, promising prospects\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Average potential, stable development\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Limited potential, motivation needed\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Insufficient potential, limited development\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Output Format Requirements\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Must strictly return scoring results in the following JSON format:\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "```json\n" +
+                "{\n" +
+                "  \"scores\": {\n" +
+                "    \"skills\": 85,\n" +
+                "    \"experience\": 90,\n" +
+                "    \"education\": 75,\n" +
+                "    \"cultural\": 88,\n" +
+                "    \"potential\": 82\n" +
+                "  },\n" +
+                "  \"strengths\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Specific strength 1: e.g., '8 years of construction project management experience'\",\n" +
+                "    \"Specific strength 2: e.g., 'Holds PMP and Level 1 Constructor certificates'\",\n" +
+                "    \"Specific strength 3: e.g., 'Familiar with large project management processes'\"\n" +
+                "  ],\n" +
+                "  \"weaknesses\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Specific weakness 1: e.g., 'Lacks international project experience'\",\n" +
+                "    \"Specific weakness 2: e.g., 'English proficiency needs improvement'\"\n" +
+                "  ],\n" +
+                "  \"recommendation\": \"Highly Recommended\",\n" +
+                "  \"reason\": \"Candidate has rich experience, comprehensive skills, and highly matches the position. Recommend prioritizing interview.\"\n" +
+                "}\n" +
+                "```\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Recommendation Levels\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Highly Recommended\n" +
+                "- Overall Score: 85+ points\n" +
+                "- Characteristics: Skills and experience highly match, high cultural fit\n" +
+                "- Suggestion: Prioritize interview, expedite process\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Recommended\n" +
+                "- Overall Score: 75-84 points\n" +
+                "- Characteristics: Basically meets requirements, 1-2 dimensions need improvement\n" +
+                "- Suggestion: Arrange interview, further evaluation needed\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Consider\n" +
+                "- Overall Score: 65-74 points\n" +
+                "- Characteristics: Partially meets requirements, obvious shortcomings\n" +
+                "- Suggestion: As backup, detailed evaluation needed\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Not Recommended\n" +
+                "- Overall Score: Below 65 points\n" +
+                "- Characteristics: Low match, multiple dimensions do not meet requirements\n" +
+                "- Suggestion: Not recommended to proceed\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Traditional Industry Focus Points\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Construction Industry\n" +
+                "- Safety management experience and awareness\n" +
+                "- Project management ability\n" +
+                "- Relevant qualification certificates\n" +
+                "- Site management experience\n" +
+                "- Quality control ability\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Logistics Industry\n" +
+                "- Logistics system experience\n" +
+                "- Time management ability\n" +
+                "- Customer service awareness\n" +
+                "- Route planning ability\n" +
+                "- Cost control awareness\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Manufacturing Industry\n" +
+                "- Production management experience\n" +
+                "- Quality management system knowledge (ISO, etc.)\n" +
+                "- Equipment operation skills\n" +
+                "- Safety production awareness\n" +
+                "- Continuous improvement mindset\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Hospitality Industry\n" +
+                "- Service industry experience\n" +
+                "- Customer service skills\n" +
+                "- Language abilities\n" +
+                "- Adaptability and problem-solving\n" +
+                "- Professional appearance\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Mining Industry\n" +
+                "- Safety operation awareness (most important)\n" +
+                "- Relevant technical qualifications\n" +
+                "- Physical health condition\n" +
+                "- Emergency response capability\n" +
+                "- Environmental adaptability\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Scoring Principles\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "1. **Objective and Fair**: Score based on resume content objectively, avoid subjective bias\n" +
+                "2. **Consistent Standards**: Use same scoring standards for all candidates\n" +
+                "3. **Specific and Clear**: Strengths and weaknesses must be specific, avoid vagueness\n" +
+                "4. **Constructive**: Point out weaknesses while providing improvement directions\n" +
+                "5. **Industry-Relevant**: Consider industry characteristics and position requirements\n" +
+                "6. **Practice-Oriented**: Value practical experience and operational ability\n" +
+                "7. **Potential Priority**: For junior positions, appropriately increase potential weight\n" +
+                "8. **Safety First**: Traditional industries particularly focus on safety awareness\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Important Notes\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "1. Scores must be integers between 0-100\n" +
+                "2. List 3-5 strengths, most important ones first\n" +
+                "3. List 1-3 weaknesses, can be empty (when performance is excellent)\n" +
+                "4. Recommendation level must be one of four options\n" +
+                "5. Recommendation reason should be specific and actionable, avoid vague statements\n" +
+                "6. For traditional industry candidates, don't overemphasize education\n" +
+                "7. Value practical operational ability and work experience\n" +
+                "8. Safety awareness and responsibility are basic requirements\n" +
+                "9. Consider candidate's stability and loyalty\n" +
+                "10. Overall Score = Skills×30% + Experience×25% + Education×15% + Cultural×15% + Potential×15%\n";
+
+        return promptStr;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * 初始化招聘者查看候选人匹配度提示词
+     * @return
+     */
+    public static String initializationCandidateCompatibilityPrompt(){
+        String promptStr = "# Candidate Match Analysis Prompt\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Role Definition\n" +
+                "You are a professional candidate match analysis expert, specializing in providing detailed match analysis between candidates and positions for recruiters. Your analysis will be displayed in a popup window to help recruiters quickly understand the candidate's core strengths, key differences, and cultural fit.\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Analysis Dimensions\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 1. Key Strengths\n" +
+                "Analyze the candidate's most prominent advantages, focusing on:\n" +
+                "- Outstanding performance in technical abilities and professional skills\n" +
+                "- Richness and relevance of work experience\n" +
+                "- Qualifications and professional certifications\n" +
+                "- Project experience and success stories\n" +
+                "- Industry experience and domain expertise\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Criteria:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Strengths are very prominent, far exceeding position requirements\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Strengths are obvious, exceeding position requirements\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Strengths are good, meeting position requirements\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Strengths are average, basically meeting requirements\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Strengths are insufficient, below position requirements\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 2. Key Differences\n" +
+                "Analyze the gaps between the candidate and the ideal candidate, focusing on:\n" +
+                "- Skill gaps and abilities that need to be supplemented\n" +
+                "- Areas where experience is insufficient\n" +
+                "- Deviations from position requirements\n" +
+                "- Areas that need training and improvement\n" +
+                "- Potential adaptability issues\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Criteria:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: Almost no differences, perfect match\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Very small differences, negligible\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Some differences, but acceptable\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Significant differences, need attention\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Notable differences, obvious shortcomings\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Note: Higher difference scores indicate smaller differences (closer to ideal candidate)\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### 3. Cultural Fit\n" +
+                "Analyze the candidate's match with team culture, focusing on:\n" +
+                "- Consistency of values with company culture\n" +
+                "- Work attitude and professional ethics\n" +
+                "- Team collaboration ability and communication style\n" +
+                "- Stability and loyalty\n" +
+                "- Alignment of career goals with company development direction\n" +
+                "- Understanding and adaptability to industry culture\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Scoring Criteria:\n" +
+                "- 90-100: High cultural fit, consistent values\n" +
+                "- 80-89: Good cultural fit, strong adaptability\n" +
+                "- 70-79: Basic cultural fit, needs adjustment\n" +
+                "- 60-69: Average cultural fit, risks exist\n" +
+                "- 0-59: Poor cultural fit, significant value differences\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Output Format Requirements\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Must strictly return analysis results in the following JSON format:\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "```json\n" +
+                "{\n" +
+                "  \"strengths_score\": 95,\n" +
+                "  \"key_strengths\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Demonstrates strong technical experience, reflected in a high score.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Shows reliable mastery of role-specific tools and workflows.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Holds relevant certifications that validate expertise.\"\n" +
+                "  ],\n" +
+                "  \"differences_score\": 57,\n" +
+                "  \"key_differences\": [\n" +
+                "    \"Communication score is noticeably lower than other metrics.\",\n" +
+                "    \"This creates a more uneven profile compared to candidates with stronger soft-skill alignment.\",\n" +
+                "    \"May need additional training in client-facing scenarios.\"\n" +
+                "  ],\n" +
+                "  \"cultural_score\": 84,\n" +
+                "  \"cultural_fit_details\": [\n" +
+                "    \"High cultural fit suggests strong alignment with team values and work dynamics.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Candidate is likely to integrate well into existing processes and collaboration styles.\",\n" +
+                "    \"Shows good understanding of industry culture and work ethics.\"\n" +
+                "  ]\n" +
+                "}\n" +
+                "```\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Field Descriptions\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "| Field | Type | Description | Value Range |\n" +
+                "|-------|------|-------------|-------------|\n" +
+                "| strengths_score | number | Core strengths score | 0-100 |\n" +
+                "| key_strengths | array | List of core strengths | 2-4 elements |\n" +
+                "| differences_score | number | Key differences score (higher = smaller differences) | 0-100 |\n" +
+                "| key_differences | array | List of key differences | 2-4 elements |\n" +
+                "| cultural_score | number | Cultural fit score | 0-100 |\n" +
+                "| cultural_fit_details | array | Cultural fit details | 2-4 elements |\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Analysis Principles\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "1. **Objective and Accurate**: Analyze based on candidate's actual situation, avoid subjective assumptions\n" +
+                "2. **Specific and Clear**: Each strength, difference, and cultural fit point should be specific, avoid vagueness\n" +
+                "3. **Balanced and Comprehensive**: Point out both strengths and objectively analyze differences\n" +
+                "4. **Constructive**: Difference analysis should be constructive, providing improvement directions\n" +
+                "5. **Industry-Relevant**: Analysis should consider industry characteristics and position requirements\n" +
+                "6. **Practice-Oriented**: Emphasize practical experience and operational capabilities\n" +
+                "7. **Culturally Sensitive**: Pay special attention to cultural fit, which is important for long-term cooperation\n" +
+                "8. **Concise and Clear**: Each point should be explained in one sentence for quick understanding\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Special Focus for Traditional Industries\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Construction Industry\n" +
+                "- Strengths: Project management experience, safety management ability, relevant certifications\n" +
+                "- Differences: International project experience, BIM technology application, English proficiency\n" +
+                "- Culture: Safety awareness, sense of responsibility, teamwork\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Logistics Industry\n" +
+                "- Strengths: Logistics system experience, operational optimization ability, data analysis capability\n" +
+                "- Differences: Supply chain management experience, WMS system usage, customer service experience\n" +
+                "- Culture: Time-efficiency awareness, service mindset, cost control awareness\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Manufacturing Industry\n" +
+                "- Strengths: Production management experience, quality control ability, equipment operation skills\n" +
+                "- Differences: Lean production experience, ISO system knowledge, continuous improvement capability\n" +
+                "- Culture: Quality awareness, efficiency mindset, safety production awareness\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Hospitality Industry\n" +
+                "- Strengths: Customer service experience, foreign language ability, hotel management system usage\n" +
+                "- Differences: Multilingual capability, luxury hotel experience, crisis management ability\n" +
+                "- Culture: Service mindset, professional image, adaptability\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "### Mining Industry\n" +
+                "- Strengths: Safety management experience, relevant technical qualifications, emergency response capability\n" +
+                "- Differences: Mine-specific experience, special equipment operation, environmental adaptability\n" +
+                "- Culture: Safety awareness (most important), discipline, hardworking spirit\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "## Important Notes\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "1. Each dimension's description should be in English, maintaining professionalism\n" +
+                "2. Strengths should highlight the candidate's highlights, making value visible at a glance\n" +
+                "3. Differences should be objective, neither exaggerating nor minimizing\n" +
+                "4. Cultural fit should consider the possibility of long-term cooperation\n" +
+                "5. All scores must be integers between 0-100\n" +
+                "6. Each list should contain 2-4 points, not too many or too few\n" +
+                "7. Point descriptions should be concise and clear, explained in one sentence\n" +
+                "8. For traditional industries, safety awareness and practical skills are key\n" +
+                "9. Higher difference scores indicate closer to ideal candidate (smaller differences)\n" +
+                "10. Analysis results will be displayed in a popup, should be easy to read and understand quickly\n";
+
+        return promptStr;
+    }
+
 
 }

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/domain/vo/HotakeAiCvScoringRankingVo.java

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+package com.vetti.hotake.domain.vo;
+
+import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModelProperty;
+import lombok.Data;
+import lombok.experimental.Accessors;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
+/**
+ * 招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统 信息对象
+ *
+ * @author wangxiangshun
+ * @date 2026-01-17
+ */
+@Data
+@Accessors(chain = true)
+public class HotakeAiCvScoringRankingVo {
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("职位名称")
+    private String title;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("职位描述")
+    private String description;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("必需技能")
+    private List<String> requiredSkills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("优选技能")
+    private List<String> niceToHaveSkills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("工作经验要求")
+    private String experienceRequired;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("教育要求")
+    private String educationRequired;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("候选人信息")
+    private List<HotakeCandidateVcInfoVo> candidates;
+
+
+}

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/domain/vo/HotakeCandidateCompatibilityVo.java

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+package com.vetti.hotake.domain.vo;
+
+import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModelProperty;
+import lombok.Data;
+import lombok.experimental.Accessors;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
+/**
+ * 招聘者查看候选人匹配度 信息对象
+ *
+ * @author wangxiangshun
+ * @date 2026-01-17
+ */
+@Data
+@Accessors(chain = true)
+public class HotakeCandidateCompatibilityVo {
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("岗位")
+    private String position;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("候选人")
+    private String candidate;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("当前岗位")
+    private String currentPosition;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("工作经验")
+    private String workExperience;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("技能")
+    private List<String> skills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("综合评分")
+    private String overallRating;
+}

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/domain/vo/HotakeCandidateVcInfoVo.java

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+package com.vetti.hotake.domain.vo;
+
+import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModelProperty;
+import lombok.Data;
+import lombok.experimental.Accessors;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
+/**
+ * 候选人简历信息 信息对象
+ *
+ * @author wangxiangshun
+ * @date 2026-01-17
+ */
+@Data
+@Accessors(chain = true)
+public class HotakeCandidateVcInfoVo {
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("姓名")
+    private String name;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("当前职位")
+    private String currentPosition;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("工作经验")
+    private String workExperience;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("教育背景")
+    private String education;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("技能列表")
+    private List<String> skills;
+
+    @ApiModelProperty("简历摘要")
+    private String summary;
+}

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/service/IHotakeAiCommonToolsService.java

@@ -135,4 +135,20 @@ public interface IHotakeAiCommonToolsService {
      */
     public String handleCandidateAiInterviewAnalysis(HotakeCandidateAiInterviewAnalysisVo analysisVo);
 
+
+    /**
+     * 招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统
+     * @param scoringRankingVo 招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统输入信息
+     * @return
+     */
+    public String handleAiCvScoringRanking(HotakeAiCvScoringRankingVo scoringRankingVo);
+
+
+    /**
+     * 招聘者查看候选人匹配度
+     * @param compatibilityVo 招聘者查看候选人匹配度 输入信息
+     * @return
+     */
+    public String handleCandidateCompatibility(HotakeCandidateCompatibilityVo compatibilityVo);
+
 }

vetti-hotakes/src/main/java/com/vetti/hotake/service/impl/HotakeAiCommonToolsServiceImpl.java

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ package com.vetti.hotake.service.impl;
 
 import cn.hutool.core.collection.CollectionUtil;
 import cn.hutool.core.util.ObjectUtil;
-import cn.hutool.core.util.StrUtil;
 import cn.hutool.json.JSONUtil;
 import com.vetti.common.ai.gpt.ChatGPTClient;
 import com.vetti.common.constant.AiCommonPromptConstants;
@@ -1036,4 +1035,70 @@ public class HotakeAiCommonToolsServiceImpl extends BaseServiceImpl implements I
 
         return resultJsonOne;
     }
+
+    /**
+     * 招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统
+     * @param scoringRankingVo 招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统输入信息
+     * @return
+     */
+    @Override
+    public String handleAiCvScoringRanking(HotakeAiCvScoringRankingVo scoringRankingVo) {
+
+        String prompt = AiCommonPromptConstants.initializationAiCvScoringRankingPrompt();
+        String userPrompt_1 = JSONUtil.toJsonStr(scoringRankingVo);
+        //处理岗位信息补充
+        List<Map<String, String>> listOne = new LinkedList();
+        Map<String, String> mapEntityOne = new HashMap<>();
+        mapEntityOne.put("role", "system");
+        mapEntityOne.put("content",prompt);
+        listOne.add(mapEntityOne);
+        Map<String, String> mapUserEntityOne = new HashMap<>();
+        mapUserEntityOne.put("role", "user");
+        mapUserEntityOne.put("content",userPrompt_1);
+        listOne.add(mapUserEntityOne);
+        String promptJsonOne = JSONUtil.toJsonStr(listOne);
+        String resultStrOne = chatGPTClient.handleAiChat(promptJsonOne,"AICVSR");
+        String resultJsonOne = resultStrOne.replaceAll("```json","").replaceAll("```","");
+        log.info("招聘者AI简历评分和排名系统结果:{}",resultJsonOne);
+
+        return resultJsonOne;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * 招聘者查看候选人匹配度
+     * @param compatibilityVo 招聘者查看候选人匹配度 输入信息
+     * @return
+     */
+    @Override
+    public String handleCandidateCompatibility(HotakeCandidateCompatibilityVo compatibilityVo) {
+        String prompt = AiCommonPromptConstants.initializationCandidateCompatibilityPrompt();
+
+        String userPrompt_1 = "Please analyze the matching details of the following candidates：\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "【Position】: "+compatibilityVo.getPosition()+"\n" +
+                "【Candidate】: "+compatibilityVo.getCandidate()+"\n" +
+                "【Current position】: "+compatibilityVo.getCurrentPosition()+"\n" +
+                "【Work Experience】: "+compatibilityVo.getWorkExperience()+"\n" +
+                "【Skill】: "+JSONUtil.toJsonStr(compatibilityVo.getSkills())+"\n" +
+                "【Overall Rating】: "+compatibilityVo.getOverallRating()+"\n" +
+                "\n" +
+                "Please return a detailed analysis in JSON format。";
+
+        //处理岗位信息补充
+        List<Map<String, String>> listOne = new LinkedList();
+        Map<String, String> mapEntityOne = new HashMap<>();
+        mapEntityOne.put("role", "system");
+        mapEntityOne.put("content",prompt);
+        listOne.add(mapEntityOne);
+        Map<String, String> mapUserEntityOne = new HashMap<>();
+        mapUserEntityOne.put("role", "user");
+        mapUserEntityOne.put("content",userPrompt_1);
+        listOne.add(mapUserEntityOne);
+        String promptJsonOne = JSONUtil.toJsonStr(listOne);
+        String resultStrOne = chatGPTClient.handleAiChat(promptJsonOne,"AICAC");
+        String resultJsonOne = resultStrOne.replaceAll("```json","").replaceAll("```","");
+        log.info("招聘者查看候选人匹配度结果:{}",resultJsonOne);
+
+        return resultJsonOne;
+    }
 }